On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Karsten Wade<kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That makes sense. If we've got a web-based wysiwyg DocBook editor
> that can let me edit guides pulled from fedorahosted.org, that is
> pretty good. Edit can even be read-only from the SCM with write to
> local copy or some kind of web-based cache for peer review.
I'd suggest a somewhat interim (and, fairly quick) blog post around
the following bits:
- what is currently available
- what is projected to be available within the GSoC timeline
- what could be available beyond GSoC timeline
* more in terms of a roadmap
The above should provide a guidance on what the Docs team can expect
in terms of functionality and, whether the project would be in a
consumption-ready state.
> Hmm. That is a reasonable interpretation but seems to miss the spirit
> of the matter. When I see a project with a goal of, "Web-based
> wysiwyg DocBook editor for Fedora Docs," I presume there is going to
> be a working instance of something at the end.
I'd love to have a "test" instance set up that actually allows anyone
to see how things are.
/sankarshan
--
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
