John Poelstra さんは書きました:
John J. McDonough said the following on 07/28/2009 04:37 AM Pacific Time:
Noriko
Thank you so much for your careful review
----- Original Message ----- From: "Noriko Mizumoto" <noriko@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Fedora Translation Project List" <fedora-trans-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Release Notes Schedule
* 4.7 Translate f-r-n for beta Sep 6 to Sep 26 21d
This seems not consistent with f-12-trans-tasks, which says Sep 9 to
Sep 18.
While I stuck with John's dates for the releases, I tried to maximize
the time L10N had available. I wonder whether 9 days is sufficient. I
would expect this cycle that the beta would be the bulk of the
release notes (although I suppose that remains to be seen).
* 4.8 Build f-r-n.rpm for beta Sep 29
A question, there is 2 days blank between 4.7 and 4.8. What is this
for?
No good reason
* 6.7 Translate f-r-n for GA Oct 20 to Oct 26 7d
This seems not consistent with f-12-trans-tasks, which says Oct 9 to
Oct 16.
The later we can do this the better. Release notes seem to be the
last thing on people's radar, and we tend to discover important
changes late, so the later we can make the POTs the better. Also, the
original schedule had some Docs tasks out of order.
* Review translation not scheduled
Please set up 'Review translation'. Since we translate PO file, so
it is extremely helpful if docs team can build html for review
before the deadline.
That is a really excellent catch. I think we need to work on the
mechanics of this, but it could have a number of advantages.
* 7.4 Translate 0-day
I understand that docs team has little window for Zero Day Update.
But let me become devil this time as experiment. Is any chance that
rel-note team can place this entry before GA Public Availability
3-Nov for inclusion? Just tiny window is fine. I can not guarantee
at all how many translators can respond.
My expectation was that on release day the 0-day changes would be
available in English only, with an update rpm to follow the release.
However, we are still discussing whether it makes sense to have a
single rpm with six documents in 41 languages, so that may change. It
might make more sense to delay the availability of the update rpm
rather than try to push the POT creation earlier, thus missing late
breaking changes. On the other end, we are going to try to be more
proactive in hounding the developers for release notes input, so
maybe we can reduce the number of those late changes.
--McD
This is a great discussion and it is really exciting to see different
people asking the hard questions and looking for the holes that I used
to try and do all on my own :)
Unfortunately I've found that it is extremely hard (as you may be
seeing already) to create a really solid schedule over email,
particularly when more than one team is involved and questions have
been raised in response to tasks or dates someone has previously
suggested.
I would like to propose that we meet on Gobby & FedoraTalk next. So
far I have met with: Design, Release Engineering, Quality, and
Marketing to go over the Fedora 12 schedule this way. I think everyone
who attended those meetings would say they were tremendously efficient
and helpful :-)
I am not good at those at all, but will try. Btw, irc is better option
for me ;p
noriko
Could someone set up a meeting time and date using www.whenisgood.net?
I promise to add my availability and create a text version of the
existing schedule that we can then hack through and update together on
Gobby. It helps if I am there so I can capture the dependencies
between the tasks and embed them in the TaskJuggler source file.
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
