On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 20:06, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 07:57:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:32:10PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: >> > > Now, as far as Fedora producing something that is not an RPM, I >> > > would like to see an example of that. Some things are generated "on >> > > the fly" by the scripts included in the RPM, but there is nothing >> > > stopping you from looking at the scripts - even is a binary RPM. >> > >> > I think Eric was referring to our many hosted projects, >> > infrastructure, websites, artwork, and so forth, where source is >> > stored in some sort of source code control, but RPM packages are >> > indeed not produced or published. >> >> Yep, that's a large part of our missing openness. > > I have an idea -- let's use "comprehensibility" instead of "openness" > here, lest we cause some consternation about what's open and what's > not. Everything we produce in Fedora is open, transparent, and > attainable by anyone. Whether the route to do that makes sense to > people new to the project, is quite another matter, one which we hope > to rectify. > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ Yeah... I'm having vocabulary problems this week. Eric -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
