On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 07:57:51PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:32:10PM -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > > Now, as far as Fedora producing something that is not an RPM, I > > > would like to see an example of that. Some things are generated "on > > > the fly" by the scripts included in the RPM, but there is nothing > > > stopping you from looking at the scripts - even is a binary RPM. > > > > I think Eric was referring to our many hosted projects, > > infrastructure, websites, artwork, and so forth, where source is > > stored in some sort of source code control, but RPM packages are > > indeed not produced or published. > > Yep, that's a large part of our missing openness. I have an idea -- let's use "comprehensibility" instead of "openness" here, lest we cause some consternation about what's open and what's not. Everything we produce in Fedora is open, transparent, and attainable by anyone. Whether the route to do that makes sense to people new to the project, is quite another matter, one which we hope to rectify. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
