On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:25 -0500, Eric Christensen wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:15 +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> > And I have to say, maybe it's just me, but I was far more "wowed" and
> > "awed" by the Gnome & KDE release notes than the Fedora ones. I still
> > got what I wanted from the Fedora ones, but the Gnome & KDE ones really
> > gave me that desire to try them out.
>
> So in addition to the facts we should throw in some sparkly objects that
> make people NEED to come try it out. The world might end unless you try
> out our new features!
>
> I agree. I've never read the GNOME or KDE release notes but I will now.
> If we are missing something that could entice people to come on over
> then we are missing out.
I guess the main difference I recall are:
* Mentioning of what makes $thisrelease better than $thisrelease--
* A reasonably flat layout in one document. No more than 2 levels
of hierarchy (easy to digest)
* Anything that needs more details is linked elsewhere
* The document itself looks pretty. If there is a compelling new
style, then that theme is used (e.g., KDE). If the website has
a nice interface, than that style is used (Gnome). I fear,
currently, Fedora Project is lacking on both fronts, at least on
the web side.
________________________________________________________________________
Basil Mohamed Gohar
abu_hurayrah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.basilgohar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
