On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:09:22AM -0500, John J. McDonough wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> >> When scrubbing in the past, I tended to look at the page >> history for each beat to see when the last update was made. > > The things that drove that comment were a little unusual. There is > some content, for example around locating codecs, that is probably > worthwhile to include in the release notes even if it doesn't > change. On the other hand, it is easy to overlook some of that > stuff that needs update. At the last minute we scrambled around to > get updated Flash installtion instuctions on the wiki, but the > inappropriate Fedora 9 content actually appeared in the release > notes (I just now filed a bug even though I noticed that shortly > after release -- my bad). Right, and I think there's also some precedent for this in the Installer beat, where there are some average-sized changes from release to release, but even the unchanging information is extremely valuable to the user. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgp17jePXcLz0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
