On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:27:27AM -0500, John J. McDonough wrote: > In going through the wiki removing hash marks, I noticed that there are a > number of places where there is content that we want to keep for F11, so I > guess we probably don't want to be too reckless in the pre-F11 cleanup. > > On the other hand, I was reminded while doing that is that one reason that > we may want to issue an F10 update is that some F9 content, which was > inappropriate for F10, made it into the F10 release notes. So we > definitely want to be a little more thorough in our scrubbing. When scrubbing in the past, I tended to look at the page history for each beat to see when the last update was made. If it was made before the GA release notes push, I knew the beat contained nothing new. If there was something new, I'd try and retain that piece, which I'd locate using the diff function on the wiki history page. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgp9f7qt4keBo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
