On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:00 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 18:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > >> Hi Docs Team, > >> > > > >> For the Fedora 10 release I re-worked the underlying TaskJuggler file to > >> optimize reporting and the ability to allocate resources in the future. > >> As a result I've lost some of the dependencies that were built in and > >> am having a hard time reconnecting them. Also as I look at some of the > >> tasks I'm wondering if they still apply or not. > > > > I was looking for the TaskJuggler source earlier, but I went ahead and > > used plain ol' text: > > > > http://quaid.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Docs/F10-docs-schedule-notes.txt > > This is perfect! I can very easily update the TJ file using this as a > clear guide. > > Did you have any comments on the tasks prior to Beta? I'd like to get > those right too so that building F11 is on auto-pilot :) Only that we might want the wording to more closely match that in the Beta, with specific mention of the wiki only publishing. I updated this today (without Alpha) and tweaked the wording somewhat, such as clarifying "combing": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Schedule/10 - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
