On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 18:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Hi Docs Team, > > For the Fedora 10 release I re-worked the underlying TaskJuggler file to > optimize reporting and the ability to allocate resources in the future. > As a result I've lost some of the dependencies that were built in and > am having a hard time reconnecting them. Also as I look at some of the > tasks I'm wondering if they still apply or not. I was looking for the TaskJuggler source earlier, but I went ahead and used plain ol' text: http://quaid.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Docs/F10-docs-schedule-notes.txt > I'd love your help reviewing the schedule here: > http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-docs-tasks.html Thanks again, this needed doing. :) > and telling me: > > 1) Which tasks no longer apply and should be removed > 2) New tasks which should be added > 3) Existing tasks that are wrong > --please provide the task that comes before and after along with the > correct dates so I can build the right dependency logic. The highlights of what is different: * There is no building of fedora-release-notes RPM for Beta, that is saved for the PR * So L10n is bumped to PR * Only Wiki one-page is done for Beta * Added details about putting up the CMS ** Note aggressive schedule that has not been presented to Websites; may change :) * There is a zero-day (literally) update of docs.fp.o that was missing; I put it in explicitly, including a vacuum of Beats * The RC schedule is mainly unchanged * Beta and PR are mainly changed :) cheers - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
