On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 01:31 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-common.spec?root=docs&view=markup > > - Version and release ought to be in the file itself, not done via > macros > - Is there a reason why release is used where the version normally would > be? > - $RPM_BUILD_DIR with the -n value from %setup is the current directory > for %build and %install so you can remove > $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{release}/ everywhere > - Why is %{_datadir}/fedora/doc/docs-common/common/ marked %docdir? > - %{_datadir}/fedora isn't owned by the package > - Unable to verify khelpcenter directory ownership > - No changelog entry These changes have now all been made. I used %release originally because I thought there might be some value in using "cvsYYYYMMDD" on the tarball, but this was actually pretty irrelevant. Because we have to roll a new tarball anyway, we might as well simply assign a version number as we go, and tag CVS appropriately. "0.2" does not exist yet but it will when I finish the other packaging bits this weekend (fates willing and the creek don't rise). http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-common.spec?root=docs&view=markup -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
