On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:50 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:17 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I believe some changes are in order for the fedora-doc-common package. > > Rather than having this package "roll" forever with a "cvsYYYYMMDD" > > designator, I think it will be preferable, both for us and Fedora > > Extras, to simply version/release tag the specfile, per normal, and "cvs > > tag" the docs-common module with that version/release combo. If you > > want to see the current state of the file, look at this URL: > > > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-common.spec?viewcvs=docs&view=markup > > That gen'd a 400 error for me. Only because I em stoopid. Honestly, would you think it was so hard to use copy+paste? :-( In my defense, 95% of the time I do it, I just save the typos for the 5% of my work that goes out into the googlemind. *sigh* http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc-common.spec?root=docs&view=markup > Regardless, what you propose to me sounds sane and the Right Thing To > Do. Hopefully Ignacio agrees. He is buried in some other work right now but I know he will get to this when he has a chance. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
