On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>Paul W. Frields wrote: > >>>If we are going to make any such change, we should probably make it > >>>globally. Having only one document use this convention adds needless > >>>complexity to our processes. I'm not opposed to doing this, but it > >>>needs to be a global decision either way. > >>> > >>Right. Might create all those languages under > >>release-notes/languages/<international language code> globally. > > > >Wouldn't it be easier to just use release-notes/<i18n-code>? Is there > >another factorization for the content, other than by language? > > > Well if we get translation for a large number of languages which is what > I am expecting to happen soon, then its easier to manage if those sub > directories are under languages instead of the root name space. > Currently the only factor for categorization is language but we might > have other factors later. As long as there's a way to share common files like figures under a common/ subdirectory we should be OK. I'm sure Tommy will think about this and propose something logical. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
