On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > >If we are going to make any such change, we should probably make it > >globally. Having only one document use this convention adds needless > >complexity to our processes. I'm not opposed to doing this, but it > >needs to be a global decision either way. > > > Right. Might create all those languages under > release-notes/languages/<international language code> globally. Wouldn't it be easier to just use release-notes/<i18n-code>? Is there another factorization for the content, other than by language? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
