Re: Test of Docs Packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> > What am I missing?
> 3) People who want to use the FDP structure to write their own
> documentation.
> 
> They don't necessarily care a whit about our content, so CVS access and
> associated is not valuable.  Having a complete document building
> environment is.

Ah! Clarity!  "I see", said the blind man.  Much grass.

The key to cleanly producing the three RPM flavors your mentioned is
to provide a unique <flavor>.spec.in for each type.  In the
"%install" section for a flavor, we can hide all the sed/awk/install-fu we 
will need.  Leave the "Makefile" and "Makefile.common" pretty much
unchanged and transform any necessary paths from the spec file.

I'll give this some thought, now that I understand the need.

Cheers

Attachment: pgpuDMtcB0MNo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux