Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > This may point to the need for our Makefile.common to provide a use case > for a locally installed fedora-doc-common RPM. IOW, pointing to (if > it's available, or possibly if nothing else is available, or... some > combination thereof?) /usr/share/fedora/doc/docs-common/* for supporting > stuff with which to build docs "standalone" without CVS. Does that make > sense? Not to me as a doc developer. See, I've got to have CVS for my document anyway, so I just may as well keep the ../docs-common stuff checked out. Why be "slightly pregnant"? I keep envisioning only two use cases: 1) Developer -- eveything local from a CVS checkout, even if I don't have CVS write permission. 2) End user, aka read-only -- install the RPM's and yelp away. What am I missing? Cheers
Attachment:
pgpQMqXrsu5Wm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
