Re: Test of Docs Packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> The first issue was how to handle CVS versus packaging.  By that I mean
> when working out of CVS, you are expected to have a path
> "../docs-common/" that resolves.  That isn't necessarily true when
> working out of the archive (tarball) or the rpm.  

I don't envision the tarballs nor the RPM's to be used in the
authoring process.  I think we want the authors working in the CVS
arena and use the RPM/tarball as a distribution method for the
finished goods.  Read that as "end-user".

However, I like the idea of the RPM/tarball packaging process to
include the CSS and stylesheet images in the fedora-doc-common RPM.
Do you or Paul want to do the surgery?  We already browse the DOM for
info...

Cheers

Attachment: pgpsLuQwWZ5uv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux