/me watches as imap comes back to life ;( My apologies for the spam, James Laska On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 12:49 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 09:27 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > 2. The "noarch" RPM's actually contain the source; that's more a > > "src.rpm" or "-devel.noarch.rpm" to me. Don't we need room in the > > namespace for a PDF / HTML flavor of the RPM? Perhaps > > "foo-html.noarch.rpm"? > > Any objections to having the rpm contain all flavors? Seems like less > hassle with that approach. But we could benefit from standardizing on > the location of how those files get dropped onto the system. > > How about the following: > > /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang/ # chunked html > /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.html # nochunk html > /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.pdf # pdf > /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.txt # plain txt > /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.omf (perhaps a > symlink from /usr/share/omf or vice-versa) > > Thanks, > James Laska > > -- > ========================================== > James Laska -- jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx > Quality Engineering -- Red Hat, Inc. > ========================================== -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
