On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 10:35 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > AFAIK, we are using PNG and EPS only for our graphics. I don't know of > > any reason we cannot strip out JPEG handling. > > > > Fedora doc folk, what think ye? > > Well, we are not really using even EPS at the moment since we are not > actually producing any PDF's to speak of. And at that, EPS is needed > only because the passivetex backend doesn't understand anything else. > > However, I think limiting the supported graphics to, in order of > <mediaobject> listing, is: SVG, EPS, and PNG. I do all my graphics > work in SVG and then render appropriately. Regardless of how it > gets produced, we can render a PNG into whatever is necessary using > ImageMajick or netpbm. Both these tools are part of the Fedora > distribution and are thus fully blessed already. Preliminary SVG > support is provided by the librsvg2 RPM, also blessed by the distro. > > Sorry, JPG, it was nice while it lasted, but now it's over. Anytime > we see jaggies, we'll think of you... Hear, hear. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
