(setting reply-to for f-docs-l, pardon the cross-post, feel free to override headings in replies) On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 16:11 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:31 -0700, Brion Vibber wrote: > > I've looked a little bit at the files but haven't had a chance to try > > actually working on it. If someone else is itching to work on it, PLEASE > > feel free to start! > > Ok, thanks for the update Brion. > > I'm wondering if the simplest solution for the Fedora Docs team is for > us to strip out Batik's JPEG handling. Perhaps it's not required for > their work-flow. > > Karsten - can you provide some simple docs and show us how you would > process them using a proprietary Java solution? We should be able to > determine from this whether or not we can ignore the problem classes (as > a near term solution). AFAIK, we are using PNG and EPS only for our graphics. I don't know of any reason we cannot strip out JPEG handling. Fedora doc folk, what think ye? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
