Paul W. Frields wrote: > I could see this as a good way to organize: > > docs/ > selinux-faq/ > fc2/ > index.php ... > fc3/ > fc4/ > jargon-buster/ > release-notes/ > fc3/ > fc4/ > ... > > The only glitch I see is that moving directory names around is a CVS > nightmare, so the initial conversion will be ugly on the commits list. > Does anyone see other problems with this standard? Only a tiny point, but I would have put the OS split (fc2, fc3, etc) before the subject split, since most people will only be interested in documentation for a given distribution. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list