Re: f.r.c organization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus:

> I could see this as a good way to organize:
> docs/
>   selinux-faq/
>     fc2/
>       index.php ...
>     fc3/
>     fc4/
>   jargon-buster/
>   release-notes/
>     fc3/
>     fc4/
>   ...
> 
> The only glitch I see is that moving directory names around is a CVS
> nightmare, so the initial conversion will be ugly on the commits list.
> Does anyone see other problems with this standard?  

Why do CVS moves come into this at all?  You're not talking about
reorganizing the fdp CVS repository to mimic the deliverable layout
are you?

Cheers

Attachment: pgpU8Bnhd3Vg9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 

fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux