On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 07:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 23:02 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > > Because we are getting so many individual guides and projects to track, > > it made sense to move our bugzilla work into a separate Product category > > in bugzilla. > > > > Now, when you are entering a new bug report[1] or from within an > > existing bug, you can choose Fedora Documentation as the Product. This > > is a dropdown menu within the bug report. Then, each guide has an > > individual Component. > > > > Bug reports are automatically filled with initial owner and QA contact, > > as well as Cc: list. This helps us receive, sort, and manage bug > > reports more easily. It also raises the visibility of the Documentation > > Project as a peer within the Fedora Project community. > > Found a TinyURL on the wiki that should change: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Beats: > http://tinyurl.com/exov3 > > I could generate a new TinyURL, but I'm wondering why the one that's > there links to a bug entry that "hard-codes" Fedora Core as the Product. > Hit that link and you'll see what I mean. Is this a function of the > relnotes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ownership? If so, anyone with a clue who > could fix that, um, should. :-) Never mind, answered my own question. I didn't read far enough in the URL to see the product name. I will change this shortly. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
