On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 21:25 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:10 -0700, tuxxer wrote: > > So it is bad form to 'make html' and include the output in the CVS > > update? Or is it completely personal preference? > > No, you definitely should not add the HTML build to CVS. It's redundant > since the XML source is already there, and it will almost instantly be > useless if someone is pulling down the XML source to contribute to it. > > If you don't use a .cvsignore file, you'll get a little message from CVS > any time you do a "commit," or some other functions. (Assumption: the > tutorial name is "my-tutorial," and it builds English language HTML in > "my-tutorial-en," as our normal Makefile template would do.) > > ? my-tutorial-en > > If the message bugs you -- and it is a distraction to some -- then you > can create a .cvsignore file in the same directory as your XML source > files and your Makefile that reads: > > .cvsignore > my-tutorial-en > > That makes CVS ignore both the HTML build directory and the .cvsignore > file itself. You won't get any weird question-mark messages, and the > HTML will be excluded from your commits. As per Tommy's earlier > comments, you could leave out the line in .cvsignore that reads > ".cvsignore," and add the .cvsignore to your module so that anyone who > checks out your module will also have the HTML build dir ignored (since > the .cvsignore file will come down with the module). > > Clear as mud? That, I actually understand. ;-) Thanks. -- -tuxxer gpg: 57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340 EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
