On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:03 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 13:15 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > I saw a .cvsignore pop up in the documentation-guide CVS this afternoon > > > which ignores the HTML build directory. Personally, I like having the > > > HTML build directory *not* ignored; it's a good reminder for me to check > > > the build before I do a commit. Since, like all good CVS commandos in > > > training, I do a lot of "cvs up," it reminds me to build often. > > > > I have just the opposite view. When I "cvs update" I don't like > > seeing *any* output that looks to be an error message: especially one > > such as "blah-blah-en?" because it looks as if CVS is confused. The > > #1 kernel coding rule is this: "If you don't get a warning message, > > you don't have to decide to ignore it." > > Precisely why I suggested we leave it to document owners; there will > probably be just as many people for as against, and a lot who don't care > in the middle. I made a note on the wiki to ensure the Documentation > Guide will include notes on using .cvsignore files. > So it is bad form to 'make html' and include the output in the CVS update? Or is it completely personal preference? -Charlie -- -tuxxer gpg: 57EB F948 76AE 25BC E340 EFA9 FAF6 E1AC F1E1 1EA1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
