On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:10 -0700, tuxxer wrote: > So it is bad form to 'make html' and include the output in the CVS > update? Or is it completely personal preference? No, you definitely should not add the HTML build to CVS. It's redundant since the XML source is already there, and it will almost instantly be useless if someone is pulling down the XML source to contribute to it. If you don't use a .cvsignore file, you'll get a little message from CVS any time you do a "commit," or some other functions. (Assumption: the tutorial name is "my-tutorial," and it builds English language HTML in "my-tutorial-en," as our normal Makefile template would do.) ? my-tutorial-en If the message bugs you -- and it is a distraction to some -- then you can create a .cvsignore file in the same directory as your XML source files and your Makefile that reads: .cvsignore my-tutorial-en That makes CVS ignore both the HTML build directory and the .cvsignore file itself. You won't get any weird question-mark messages, and the HTML will be excluded from your commits. As per Tommy's earlier comments, you could leave out the line in .cvsignore that reads ".cvsignore," and add the .cvsignore to your module so that anyone who checks out your module will also have the HTML build dir ignored (since the .cvsignore file will come down with the module). Clear as mud? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
