On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:22 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:03 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 10:49 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > > > I looked at both jEdit and Conglomerate this morning for the first time. > > > > Initial impressions are that both are very full featured. IMHO > > > > Conglomerate has the edge for a few reasons: > > > > > > I retried conglomerate again this morning, too. It crashed on the very > > > first file I tried to open. Not ready for prime time, IMHO. > > > > Agreed. I don't get much time to hack on Conglomerate these days, > > alas. If you're a coder, it would be great if you could join us (see > > http://www.conglomerate.org ) > > > > Please can you file bugs in bugzilla.gnome.org against Conglomerate for > > crashes that occur. Please try to isolate a minimal test document that > > causes the crash, and attach that to any bugs you file; this is > > invaluable when tracking down this kind of thing (backtraces are great > > as well, assuming you have the debuginfo package installed) > > Dave, > > If you can suggest it to any of the active developers, perhaps the > contents of the FDP CVS would be a good place to get test documents. I Interesting idea, it's always useful to have a good source of real-work test cases (Conglomerate has a built-in random DocBook generator, which is useful for stress-testing). What I was really after was a specific bug report about a specific crash, though. > think we validate all of them before publication, although we use the > DocBook/XML 4.2 DTD. (Maybe that would be a good RFE for me to file in > Bugzilla -- adding a 4.2 option in some reasonable fashion.) Yes, please file this. Dave -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
