On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:03 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 10:49 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote: > > Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>, spake thus: > > > > > I looked at both jEdit and Conglomerate this morning for the first time. > > > Initial impressions are that both are very full featured. IMHO > > > Conglomerate has the edge for a few reasons: > > > > I retried conglomerate again this morning, too. It crashed on the very > > first file I tried to open. Not ready for prime time, IMHO. > > Agreed. I don't get much time to hack on Conglomerate these days, > alas. If you're a coder, it would be great if you could join us (see > http://www.conglomerate.org ) > > Please can you file bugs in bugzilla.gnome.org against Conglomerate for > crashes that occur. Please try to isolate a minimal test document that > causes the crash, and attach that to any bugs you file; this is > invaluable when tracking down this kind of thing (backtraces are great > as well, assuming you have the debuginfo package installed) Dave, If you can suggest it to any of the active developers, perhaps the contents of the FDP CVS would be a good place to get test documents. I think we validate all of them before publication, although we use the DocBook/XML 4.2 DTD. (Maybe that would be a good RFE for me to file in Bugzilla -- adding a 4.2 option in some reasonable fashion.) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
