--- Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 05:58 -0700, Rahul Sundaram > wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > What Rahul suggests is indeed how many people > have > > > solicited peer input, > > > by using fedora-docs-list. > > > > which is how LDP peer reviews are done. I have > > submitted a outline to this list before on that > > > > > http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/process.html > > One difference I see is that the peer review is done > by an assigned > person after sending the doc to submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx > That peer reviewer > sounds like our assigned editor. > > What we have been practicing with on-list > discussions seems different > from that process. It's a step _before_ having an > editor assigned. For > right now, this seems to make sense to help get a > document in good shape > for editing. no. peer reviews arent assigned to anyone in LDP . editors are assigned only after peer reviews are done by volunteers in the discussion list. Regards Rahul Sundaram __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
