On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 05:58 -0700, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > > > > What Rahul suggests is indeed how many people have > > solicited peer input, > > by using fedora-docs-list. > > which is how LDP peer reviews are done. I have > submitted a outline to this list before on that > > http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/process.html One difference I see is that the peer review is done by an assigned person after sending the doc to submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx That peer reviewer sounds like our assigned editor. What we have been practicing with on-list discussions seems different from that process. It's a step _before_ having an editor assigned. For right now, this seems to make sense to help get a document in good shape for editing. I can see that in the future, on-list discussion might be too much for peer reviews. I hope we do get to be that busy. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
