On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 17:38, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Brock Organ wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:52 -0400, Tammy Fox wrote:
> >
> >>I was about to add the common draft notice file from bug #132415, but I
> >>wanted to discuss the wording of the notice a bit more. (This was
> >>discussed on the Hardening Doc Preview thread, but I am starting a new
> >>one with a more appropriate subject.)
> >>
> >>Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > sounds good to me ...
>
> Me, too. A nice improvement:)
I also like this!
> > Then, in the parent file, the entity &BUG-NUM; would a link to the
> > Bugzilla entry for that document.
>
> We may not want the &BUG-NUM; entity to show the full URL if it's
> one of those horrendously long, page-wrapping bugzilla URLs. If
> that's indeed the case, we may want the entity to contain a complete
> ulink element with link text that is literally the bugzilla bug
> number. ('just thinking out loud here...)
The URL <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=######>
always works in my experience (for non-restricted bugs of course). If
the writer uses too long a URL, the editor can fix it without a problem.
Or for that matter, I suppose we could have a common entity:
<!ENTITY SYSTEM BZ-Q
"http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=";>
And in the writer's doc:
<!ENTITY SYSTEM BUG-URL "&BZ-Q;######">
But maybe that's just too much work? Not sure.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
