>>>>> Fedora is not in a bad state with respect to fine grained dependencies >>>>> >>>>> >> >> So >> if its a problem where's the bug report, I don't currently see any >> open bugs against ntop at all which means the problem has either been >> fixed, or the maintainer isn't aware there's an issue. Having a quick >> look at the ntop rpm it looks like its the graphviz bit the pulls in >> all the gnome stuff, no doubt that can be split out into a sub >> package, as could probably the mysql and perl dependencies. >> >> > > Whats the issue with graphviz? Nothing per say. Its the case of ntop's dependency on it for a base leve firewall/router style device it pulls in essentially the whole of gnome. A quick look at graphviz's list of deps it looks like it has split up the dependencies quite a bit. See the complaint about ntop and it pulling in metacity further up in the thread. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
