On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Once upon a time, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> said:I tried to install ntop on a firewall (minimal F9 install, tuned via
> Fedora is not in a bad state with respect to fine grained dependencies
> (it was quite bad back, at least up to FC4), mostly
> * thanks to olpc,
> * to maintainers who reported these issues,
> * because there is always some space needed on the live disc
> * thanks to split to some -libs because of multilib issues.
>
> Unless it has been solved, there was still an issue with metacity (and
> maybe gnome) and themes interdependencies. Also there are still
> monolithic big beasts like texlive, but I am not sure that it is
> that desirable to fix those.
kickstart). There were 70 packages added because of dependencies,
including metacity.
I agree here...and I don't think Fedora is not in a bad state regarding fine-grained deps...
if you want a point of comparison, take a look at Debian, maybe. Or the *BSD's.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Aioanei Rares
schaiba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese." --Charles de Gaulle
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
