Re: starting Fedora Server SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> 
> Not so bad - 145 packages, 110 MB

Fedora is not in a bad state with respect to fine grained dependencies
(it was quite bad back, at least up to FC4), mostly 
* thanks to olpc,
* to maintainers who reported these issues,
* because there is always some space needed on the live disc
* thanks to split to some -libs because of multilib issues.

Unless it has been solved, there was still an issue with metacity (and
maybe gnome) and themes interdependencies. Also there are still
monolithic big beasts like texlive, but I am not sure that it is
that desirable to fix those.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux