On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This >>>>> is no way intended as a criticism of a Ubuntu, but it's a realization >>>>> that distributions like Ubuntu are able to offer a better user >>>>> experience by using stable software on a longer support cycle. >>>> >>>> And this is good thing. Ubuntu has not shown themselves capable of >>>> doing anything else but this, so let the, have that. >>> >>> Beg your pardon? How many years has fedora policy forced a horribly >>> fractured 3rd party repository situation - and not had a working java at >>> all while Ubuntu's approach was much more sensible? >> >> Fedora has a policy which they stuck to. A policy which many of us agree >> with. > > Then I guess I shouldn't be surprised at your lack of concern about having a > usable product on other fronts as well. I have a very usable product thank you very much. And this seems fairly offtopic for this thread. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
