Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> >
>>>
>>> This
>>> is no way intended as a criticism of a Ubuntu, but it's a realization
>>> that distributions like Ubuntu are able to offer a better user
>>> experience by using stable software on a longer support cycle.
>>
>> And this is good thing. Ubuntu has not shown themselves capable of
>> doing anything else but this, so let the, have that.
>
> Beg your pardon?  How many years has fedora policy forced a horribly
> fractured 3rd party repository situation - and not had a working java at
>  all while Ubuntu's approach was much more sensible?

Fedora has a policy which they stuck to. A policy which many of us agree with.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux