On Friday, 07 November 2008 at 18:43, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >On Friday, 07 November 2008 at 01:30, Brian Pepple wrote: > >>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg01359.html > > > >You can't expect every packager to read every mail on fedora-devel-list. > >There is simply too much traffic here, not to mention the contents of any > >longer discussion have little to do with the original subject. > > > >Personally, I only glimpse over the subjects and only read (parts of) the > >threads > >that have interesting subjects. > > There is a expectation however the all packagers read the announcements > to fedora-devel-announce list carefully. It was created precisely > because this list is high traffic. Yes. I guess I should've paid more attention to the announcement. I still think it's counter-intuitive to redefine the meaning of "ASSIGNED" state. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
