On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 19:38 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Sorry, not a word about "ASSIGNED" meaning CONFIRMED here. The word "ASSIGNED" > wasn't even mentioned during the meeting, unless the log is > incomplete. No, the IRC log is complete. No one in FESCo (or the various member of qa and rel-eng that weighed-in during that discuss) had any objections about that particular part of the proposal. > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2008-February/msg00019.html > > Therefore, I have to conclude that this change was NOT, in fact, > approved by the FESCo. > No, as stated in the meeting summary it was approved, and has been in effect for the last 9+ months. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
