Re: Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> It means a non-comps solution won't happen short term, so in the
> meanwhile if we want to classify things comps is the only realistic
> place to do so (even if it's not perfect)

But what does a classification with every single package gain you?
(Including libraries?) What's the usage case?

Right now, we use comps as:

- An input to a graphical package selector

  Adding everything here is likely to make large portions of the UI
  unusable. 

- An input to tree composition tools

  Adding everything here, as long as it's all 'optional', is likely
  to have less effect.

<insert other things that comps is used for here>

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux