2008/11/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > === Comps === > * FESCo brain-stormed for a bit on ways to improve comps. Some of the > ideas were: > * Having a Grand Arbitrator of Comps (notting's name was thrown as > a possible candidate) > * Use pkgdb to manage comps > * Making comps a MUST item in the package review. > * In the interim, notting will update the comps wiki page to better > clarify what should be included in comps, and FESCo will discuss some > more whether to make comps a MUST item in the review process. All packages should go in comps. I don't know why notting is against this?!!? Why should my php-pear-* packages be excluded from comps for example? Just because some newb might not want to install them does not mean a php web developer would not use comps to install them. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
