On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:38 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > I think that it should be done the other way around, propose the > changes that affect the whole distro on th is list, listen to what > people have to say, or, more importantly what code they have to > propose if they don't like a given design, and then implement it with > all the concerned parties. I don't think it can work like that. 1. send a mail saying sendmail won't be on the default desktop install 2. heat hands on ensuing flames The problem with fedora-devel-list is that the 0.01% of most technical users are there, most unable to understand that normal people don't use an smtp server or setup nfs. If we include everything we've ever started by default in the future versions, and any of the latest cool new stuff, our boot times are going to get longer, and our base install bigger. Design by committee just doesn't work. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
