Jesse Keating wrote : > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:02 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: > > > > > > libcaca-0.99-0.5.beta16.fc10 > > ---------------------------- > > * Mon Oct 27 18:00:00 2008 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net/> > > 0.99-0.5.beta16 > > - Update to 0.99beta16. > > - Update Source URL. > > This build dropped a provided soname, libcucul.so.0()(64bit) This > breaks a few things, which aren't in Fedora proper so they didn't show > up in the dep check. Please look into why the soname dropped between > builds. The two libraries, libcaca and libcucul, got merged into libcaca. Note that this version installs "compatibility" symlinks as "libcucul.so.0 -> libcaca.so.0", but those aren't detected as provides by rpm. Dependant external programs simply need to be rebuilt. Another (ugly) solution might be to add explicit "Provides:" for libcucul sonames to the package. If this is too much of a hassle so late in the Fedora 10 cycle, then I'd have no objection to have this build reverted. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) - Linux kernel 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.x86_64 Load : 0.10 0.08 0.15 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
