On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:52:17 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:59:06 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > My proposal has always been to use the exact same procedures than in > > > fedora, so nothing like in fedora legacy. > > > > In Fedora you don't become a kernel/glibc/X pkg maintainer all of a > > sudden. You would either work at Red Hat, or you would have to use the > > current kernel-maintainers as your proxy for quite a long time before they > > would approve a "commits" request in pkgdb. > > The idea here is to open ACLs for release that are no longer supported. I do understand that, but we talk past eachother. Let's assume you start with the F-8 branch opened up to all packagers. Then you still need a procedure where previously unknown people join the project and be sponsored or something like that to get direct access to the pkgs and buildsys and so on. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
