On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 18:22 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > > > I really don't see how a Fedora Legacy can be maintained. > > Ask yourselves: How can EPEL be maintained? It's a relatively new project. It still has to prove that it will be maintained properly after two or more years. Let's wait and see how the EPEL packagers will react to the first build troubles, where they will get failures because current Fedora and upstream are versions ahead of RHEL and they cannot simply push a version upgrade into EPEL. EPEL itself doesn't even have the man-power to fix the repoclosure report. The person who broke it almost half a year ago could simply revert the broken changes, but even that doesn't happen. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
