Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 05:02:30PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Honestly after several days of discussion this week are the proponents
> any further along than what was proposed in the UAEL draft? I haven't
> seen a single new idea.  

Like my ideas above about having a 6 month timeframe for UAEL?

> Until someone new, who is committed to moving an implementation 
> forward steps forward, this discussion is moot. Would WPI give you 
> some infrastructure resources to burn on this to supplement existing 
> project infrastructure to demonstrate that it was a sustainable 
> effort?

Sure, what is needed?  Nothing that isn't already provided by Fedora 
Infrastructure as far as I can see.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux