On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:21:47AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:12:42AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> Just a note for those not familiar with the habits from Livna/RPM >>>> Fusion: Livna/RPM Fusion normally doesn't take any packages that >>>> are suitable for Fedora (¹). >>> Can you define "suitable" :-) ? there are some packages that are >>> suitable in theory, but won't get in without a fight through FeSCo. >> >> Which free software package without patent issue wouldn't be suitable? >> Maybe an additional kernel (like the bsd kernel or the HURD, would be >> nice, any taker?), but otherwise? > > - packages likely to be vetoed by a Red Hat employee (and therefore by > FeSCo): compat-python, compat-gcc-32 Red Hat does not control FESCo. There are Red Hat employees on FESCo, but each one was elected by the community. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
