On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Horst H. von Brand wrote:
>>
>>> Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'd love to see this. It could e.g. keep a service in the process of
>>>> being decommissioned alive a little longer without having to do the
>>>> usual upgrade.
>>>
>>> Currently you have *6 months* to move over to the next Fedora...
>>
>> s/6/13/ ?
>>
>
> I think the problem is that people have a hard time seeing what each
> other is talking about. I think this is what the upgrade policy is.
>
> Release EOL
> Fedora 8 2007-11-10 2008-12-25?
> Fedora 9 2008-05-13 2008-05-XX
> Fedora 10 2008-11-25? 2008-11-XX
> Fedora 11 2008-05-XX 2009-05-XX
>
I don't know who the idiot who wrote this is... but boy he should be shot.
Release EOL
Fedora 8 2007-11-10 2008-12-25?
Fedora 9 2008-05-13 2008-06-XX
Fedora 10 2008-11-25? 2009-12-XX
Fedora 11 2009-05-XX 2010-06-XX
Fedora 12 2009-11-XX 2010-12-XX
Fedora 13 2010-05-XX 2011-06-XX
> If Fedora were to make its schedules of 6 months.. and I am at Fedora
> 8, I have 7 months to move from Fedora 8 -> 9 since 8 isn't available
> til 6 months out of my 13 month support. Now the lifetime of Fedora 8
> would be 13 months.. but my window to upgrade before I lose security
> is 7 months.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
> How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
> in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
>
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
