On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Horst H. von Brand wrote:
>
>> Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> I'd love to see this. It could e.g. keep a service in the process of
>>> being decommissioned alive a little longer without having to do the
>>> usual upgrade.
>>
>> Currently you have *6 months* to move over to the next Fedora...
>
> s/6/13/ ?
>
I think the problem is that people have a hard time seeing what each
other is talking about. I think this is what the upgrade policy is.
Release EOL
Fedora 8 2007-11-10 2008-12-25?
Fedora 9 2008-05-13 2008-05-XX
Fedora 10 2008-11-25? 2008-11-XX
Fedora 11 2008-05-XX 2009-05-XX
If Fedora were to make its schedules of 6 months.. and I am at Fedora
8, I have 7 months to move from Fedora 8 -> 9 since 8 isn't available
til 6 months out of my 13 month support. Now the lifetime of Fedora 8
would be 13 months.. but my window to upgrade before I lose security
is 7 months.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
