On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:06:32AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > As a suggestion, create your proposal focusing around opening the ACLs > on the older package branches, and keeping the build infrastructure in > place for them. Don't mention "LTS" and take baby steps. Agreed. > FESCo will likely ask for input from Infrastructure and Rel-Eng as well, > given that Rel-Eng would be required to push updates, and Infrastructure > will have to allocate storage for this. Getting the conversation > started with those groups now would be advised. Infrastructure has been > moving EOL releases to archives, so other changes would be needed to > point repos to the right locations would be needed also. Yes. I have begun to read in the wiki how to contact infrastructure people and things like that, I will certainly begin asking questions on the relevant mailing lists soon. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
