Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Patrice Dumas [13/10/2008 13:23] :
> > >
> > > Why are you telling about half baked updates? Who will do that? Fedora
> > 
> > They're half-baked in the sense that there's less commitement
> > post-EOL than pre-EOL.

> But post-EOL there is currently no commitment and there won't be any
> promise on it. Some is better than not at all.

"Might someday get looked at and fixed, if somebody cares" is definitely
much worse than "No more fixes, do upgrade".

[Yes, the exact same reasoning behind rm(1)ed files are gone for good:
 Users moan the first few times they get burned, afterwards they learn and
 are careful.]
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux