On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 09:42 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > * Patrice Dumas [13/10/2008 13:23] : > > > > > > > > Why are you telling about half baked updates? Who will do that? Fedora > > > > > > They're half-baked in the sense that there's less commitement > > > post-EOL than pre-EOL. > > > But post-EOL there is currently no commitment and there won't be any > > promise on it. Some is better than not at all. > > "Might someday get looked at and fixed, if somebody cares" is definitely > much worse than "No more fixes, do upgrade". Some users will do so, but others will react as Wikipedia did: Quit using Fedora and switch to a different distro or OS. Hell, folks, I have seen people switching to MinGW, because of this. They told me, "MinGW" better suites their needs because it offers support for "this weird GNU-stuff" on "the industry-standard OS". -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
